Pregnancy After the Manchester Fothergill Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25077/aoj.4.1.120-124.2020Abstract
Pregnancy after a manchester fothergill action is rare, occurring 1-10,000 post-action. post- manchester fothergill pregnancy can cause premature labor, spontaneous abortion, fetal death, maternal urinary complaints, and sepsis. Case of a 34-year-old female patient, G3P1A1L1 37-38 weeks of term parturient latent phase of first stage + once previous cesarean section + history of manchester fothergill. Previous history of childbirth the patient gave birth through cesarean section and term, the birth weight of children 3200 gr. The second pregnancy the patient suffered a miscarriage at 13-14 weeks gestation and found cervical elongation, then the patient was performed cervical reconstruction with the manchester fothergill procedure after the patient received his normal menstrual cycle. after 2 years later the patient came pregnant with a gestational age of 9 months with complaints of low back pain in the placenta. The conclusion of this case of pregnancy after the manchester fothergill action is a rare condition. pelvic organ prolapse and cervical elongation in pregnancy are conditions to be aware of, therefore early diagnosis is very important for smooth pregnancy. individual approach depends on gestational age, the severity of the prolapse is a matter that must be considered for the choice of delivery. prevention of complications can determine the success of a pregnancy. it must also be concluded that prolapse is not a disease of the elderly.
Keywords: cervical elongation, Manchester FothergillReferences
Dutta DC. Displacement of the uterus. In: D. C. Dutta, eds. D. C. Dutta’s Text book of Gynecology, 6th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2013: 198-226.
Suphan MN, Ng RK. Uterine prolapse complicating pregnancy and labor: a case report and literature review. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23(5):647-50.
Keettel WC. Prolapse of the uterus during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1941;42:121 126.
Sawyer D, Frey K. Cervical prolapse during pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:216 218.
Karatayli R, Gezginc K, Kantarci AH, Acar A. Successful treatment of uterine prolapse by abdominal hysteropexy performed during cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:319-22.
Kart C, Aran T, Guven S. Stage IV C prolapse in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;112:142-3.
Law H, Fiadjoe P. Urogynaecological problems in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32(2):109-12.
Yogev Y, Horowitz ER, Ben-Haroush A, Kaplan B. Uterine cervical elongation and prolapse during pregnancy: an old unsolved problem. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2003;30(4):183-5.
Rouzi AA, Sahly NN, Shobkshi AS, Abduljabbar HS. Manchester repair : An alternative to hysterectomy. Saudi Medical journal. 2009;30(11):1473-1475.
Latip N, Py Ng, Jaili S, Nordin NM. Manchester Fothergill procedure for treatment of recurrence procidentia in young nulliparous woman : A case report. Malaysia medical journal. 2017;73(1):41-43.
Hiremath PB, Bansal N, Hiremath R. Extrem cervical elongation. International journal of reproduction, contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;3(3):777-779
Berger MB, Ramanah R. Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?. international urogynecology journal. 2012;23(8);1095-1103.
Nosti PA, Sokol AI. Defining cervical elongation ; A prospective observational study. Journal of obstetrics and gynecology Canada. 2017;39(4):223-228.
Ibeanu OA, Chesson RR, Sandquist D, Perez J, Santago K, Nolan TE. Hypertrophic cervical elongation ; clinical and histological correlations. Int urogynecol J. 2010;21:995-1000.
Mothes AR, Mothes H, Frober R, Radosa MP, Runnebaum IB. Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Eropean journal of obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive biology. 2016;200:40-44.
Mohattane A, Abida A, Fourati MC, Ouhame H, Yousfi M, Benyahya MA, Bargach S. Enormous hypertrophic cervical elongation appeared during the labour a rare case report. Scholars journal of Applied medical sciences. 2018;6(9):3317-3318.
De boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, Vierhout MA. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse : cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1313-1319.
Grisales T. Commentary on : the Manchester-Fothergill proceduree versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension : a matched historical cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(3):455-456.
Valecha SM, Dhingra D. Nadkarni’s sleeve excision anastomosis for pelvic organ prolapse due to cervical elongation. International Journal of Current Research. 2015;7(1):11985-11988.
Bergman I, Soderberg MW. Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy : A population-based register study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:257-266
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Andalas Obstetrics And Gynecology Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright of published articles and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
Andalas Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal (AOJ) is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author for the original work.