Diagnostic Test On Modified Score Of Cesarean Section History In Placenta Accreta Index In Predicting Placenta Accreta Diagnosis In Rsup Dr M Djamil

Authors

  • Widayat Widayat Sungai Dareh District Hospital, Dharmasraya, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Andi Friadi Sub Division of Gynecological Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University, Dr. M. Djamil Central General Hospital Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Hafni Bacthiar Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/aoj.5.2.215-230.2021

Abstract

Introduction : Placenta accreta is defined as abnormal implantation of placenta villi which invades myometrium without the presence of decidua bacalis resulting in placenta that is difficult to remove. Based on the depth of invasion, placenta accreta is divided into three grades, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta. Placenta accreta developes if chorionic villi attaches to endometrium beyond desidua basalis. Placenta increta develops when chorionic villi invades the whole myometrium. Placenta percreta developes when chorionic villi attaches beyond myometrium reaching serous and abdominal organ. Based on clinical manifestation, placenta accreta is the common term being used. Incident of abnormal placenta invasion varies from 1 : 93.000 up to 1 : 540 pregnancy. PA incidence had increased four times from 1994 to 2002 in line with increased of caesarean section procedure. Other study showed history of caesarean section increased risk of placenta accreta up to 8,7 times. Placenta accreta index (PAI) was developed based on scoring process or various parameters assessment to help diagnose placenta accreta. The parameters including: history of caesarean section ≥ 2 times, lacunae grade, sagittal smallest myometrial thickness, anterior placenta previa and birding vessel. High PAI indicates high risk of abnormal placenta invasion based on histology.

Objective : This study aims to investigate modified history of cesarean section score in placenta accreta index in predicting placenta accreta diagnosis in RSUP DR M  Djamil Padang.

Material and methods : This was analytical study with cross sectional design. Study population was 84 placenta accreta patients in RSUP Dr. M. Djamil Padang from 2016 to 2019. Study sample was recruited using simple random sampling technique after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistic analysis was done using Cohen’s Kappa test. Diagnostic test including sensiticivy, specivicity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy.

Result : Strenght of agreement diagnosis placenta accreta based on PAI showed Kappa score of -0,002 (Kappa score < 0,2) which indicated  poor strength of agreement. Strenght of agreement diagnosis placenta accreta based on modified PAI showed Kappa score of 0,353 (Kappa score range from 0,21 to 0,40) which indicated fair strength of agreement. PAI diagnostic test yield sensitivity of 97,1%, specificity of 2,8%, positive predictive value of 48,5%, negative predictive value of 50%, and accuracy of 48,6%. Modified PAI diagnostic test yield sensitivity of 97,1%, specificity of 38,9%, positive predictive value of 60%, negative predictive value of 93,3%, and accuracy of 67,1%.

Conclusion : PAI has high sensitivity, low specificity, moderate positive predictive value, moderate negative predictive value, and moderate accuration. Modified PAI has high sensitivity, moderate specificity, moderate positive predictive value, high negative predictive value, and high accuracy. PAI diagnosis has poor strength of agreement compared with pathology anatomy. Modified PAI diagnosis has fair strength of agreement compared with pathology anatomy. Modified PAI has identical sensitivity with standard PAI, meanwhile for specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy, modified PAI yields higher result compared to PAI.

Keywords: Modified score of history caesarean section, placenta accreta index, Modified placenta accreta index, diagnostic test of placenta accreta diagnosis

References

Cunningham FG. Williams Obstetrics, 25th Edition. Chapter 35-Obstetrics Haemorrhage. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. p. 776-780

Bowman ZS. Accuracy of Ultrasound for Prediction of Placenta Accreta. USA: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2014. p. 177.ei – e7.

Baughman, WC. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Of US and MR Imaging Findings Vol 28.Ohio: RadioGraphics Journal from The Departement Of Radology and Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2008. p. 1905-1917.

Belfort MA. Publication American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology :Placenta Accreta.Washington: Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; 2010.p. 430– 7.

Stirnemann J. Screening for Plasenta Accreta at 11-4 Weeks of Gestation.Washington:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2011.p. 547.ei –e5.

Afzal S, Masroor I.Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta. Pakistan: Pakistan Journal Radiology; 2010. p. 165-7.

Riteau A, et al. Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging n Diagnosis of Plasenta Accreta.Vol 9.Issue 4.France ;2014.p.1-9.

Martha R, Dashe, et al.Ultrasound Predictors of Placental Invasion: The Placenta Accreta Index. USA: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2015.p. 343.ei – 343.e7.

Samosir SM, Irianti S, dan Tjahyadi D. Diagnostic test of placenta accreta index score (PAIS) as supporting prenatal diagnosis and outcomes of maternal neonatal in abnormally invasive placenta management at general hospital of Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol, 2017:6(9); 3765-9.

Firmana, I. Ariadi. Hubungan Skor Plasenta Akreta Indeks (PAI) dengan Kejadian Plasenta Akreta pada pasien bersalin di bagian kebidanan RSUP. dr. M. Djamil Padang. Andalas Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal. 2019.

Nelson T, Chang E et al. Validation of the Placenta Accreta Index (PAI): Improving the antenatal diagnosis of the morbidly adherent placenta. USA: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2017. p.209.

Ellakwa, H et al.Evaluation of placenta accreta index to predict placental invasion in patients with placenta previa. Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University . Menoufia Medical Journal. 2019. Vol 32 no 4.

Tovbin J, Maymon R et al. Predicting of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system: A prospective study. Israel: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assaf Harofeh Medical Center; 2016.

Li luo et al. Scoring system for the prediction of the severity of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: a prospective observational study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Springer. 2019.

Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24. PMID: 28599899.

Berkley EM, Abuhamad A. Imaging of Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):755-765. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000407. PMID: 30339609.

Society of Gynecologic Oncology; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Cahill AG, Beigi R, Heine RP, Silver RM, Wax JR. Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):B2-B16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.042. PMID: 30471891.

Carusi DA. The Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):733-742. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000391. PMID: 30204619.

Bloomfield V, Rogers S, Leyland N. Placenta accreta spectrum. CMAJ. 2020 Aug 24;192(34):E980. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200304. PMID: 32839166; PMCID: PMC7840512.

Bartels HC, Postle JD, Downey P, Brennan DJ. Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Review of Pathology, Molecular Biology, and Biomarkers. Dis Markers. 2018 Jul 3;2018:1507674. doi: 10.1155/2018/1507674. PMID: 30057649; PMCID: PMC6051104.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-02

Issue

Section

RESEARCH ARTICLE